Source |
An autobiography has more of fictional nature than one might believe. As
we try to remember what happened twenty years ago our mind gets blurry and the
feelings we have now of that moment may incorporate some aspects that may not
be completely true. Naipaul in his Reading and Writing is a good example of it.
Not only this but the novelisation of the story in order to make it attractive
or more appealing to the reader situation is seen at this text. Naipaul uses
his dad as a critical character for his story and describes in detail the
situations that happens to him, which help us readers to overcome the
reader-writer barrier that can be very hard because of the time in which it was
written, the writers background and the historic context in which it was
written, an aspect most people fail to remember when reading, and especially
important when it is an autobiography you are reading.
Naipaul is not the only one that
uses this technique when writing an autobiographical text. We might want to add
Esmeralda Santiago in, as she works a novelistic autobiography in When I was
Puertorrican, Almost a Woman and The Turkish Lover. In these text we can see
aspects very similar to what Naipaul uses, the characterization of, in this
case, the mother and a very good description of places and situations for us to
picture.
It is crucial to remember that, even
when we use novelistic techniques to make an autobiography more appealing and
interesting, it has to stay an autobiography. When using these techniques there
is a very fine line between a novel and an autobiography that if one is not
careful enough, you might end up with a totally fictional text.
When I was Puerto Rican by Esmeralda Santiago is an excellent example to support your point about the novelisation of autobiographies and how different techniques and ways of writing can make an autobiography more appealing to the reader. Great post!
ReplyDelete